Skip to main content

The Hobbit - Defining the Look




A look into the use of lighting and colour to create emotion.


Originally published in 1937, The Hobbit was written by J. R. R. Tolkien.

It has since been made into a Trilogy by the film director Peter Jackson consisting of:
  • The Unexpected Journey
  • The Desolation of Smaug
  • The Battle of the Five Armies
What is most notable about these films is that they are very different to the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. Although set in the same universe of Middle Earth, there is a tangible contrast between them. The Hobbit, some might say, is lighter, funnier and more suitable for children when compared with The Lord of the Rings. This being said, J. R. R. Tolkien did write the book for children and it was aimed at young readers around the ages of 9 and 10.

One difference, for example, is the use of lighting and colour - which is used as an extension of a particular character - to provoke an emotional response from the audience.

In general, the film is brightly lit, and, visually, light is used in contrast to the darker elements within the films in order to represent the running theme of hope. Darker scenes, from a lighting point of view, are specifically used for the literal dark characters - such as Orcs and Wargs etc...




It could also be said that the colouration of the film changes depending on the character to create a specific emotion or atmosphere. For the dramatic, danger-approaching, dark-and-evil sort of scenes, the tonal colouration used concentrates on mainly blues and greys. Deep, dark shadows are created in contrast to bright, highlighted or over-exposed areas such as the sky. (See above).


Locations that are deemed 'good' or used in the more peaceful and happy scenes are therefore the complete opposite. Hobbiton and Dale (that is before it was destroyed) are very brightly lit and contain a wide spectrum of colours that linger on warm rather than cool tones. The temperature of these tones reflects on the mood of the image greatly.


In general, the film is quite contrasty in the sense that the shadows are vivid against the highlights; the colours are over saturated and, where appropriate, have a romanticised viewpoint.

Even in the darker scenes, there is a level of fantasy that does not inflect a realistic atmosphere. These scenes also appear desaturated, and use very few warm  tones. Although the images are dark, there is a stark contrast to how the darkness is represented. For example, today's fantasy stories are very dark in comparison and there is a level of darkness that they cross where it becomes disturbing, instead of remaining a fantasy; it becomes all too real.


Whilst The Hobbit is dark in places, there is a certain boundary that the filmmakers do not cross in order to retain the film's childlike quality. Perhaps this is why the use of lighting and tonal values are so incredibly important.


And yet, even in the darkest places, there is still light where logically there should be none. It is this very reason that the film acquires a child-like quality, using light and colour to remind it's audience that even in the darkest of times there is still hope.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

STORYBOARDING: The Chess Player

A few months ago I was presented with the opportunity to create the storyboards for a student project at the University I had graduated from. Having always storyboarded my own projects, and used to drawing what I could see inside my own mind, I jumped at the chance to help visualise someone else's film. Everybody sees things differently. We imagine, we visualise in different ways. Maybe because our brains are wired differently, maybe because we all rely on different experiences or the things we've read. A wide shot to one person might be a close to another; or someone might prefer a high-angled birds eye view, whilst another a fish-eye lens effect. There are endless ways to visualise a story and we are all unique when it comes to this. So being tasked with aiding in the visualisation of someone else's film is by no means an easy feat. One must be able to see inside the director's mind, understand their vision and translate that into something that will reach and ...

What are UFO's - working with children

How to interview children and young adults Introduction: There is much taboo about working with children in film. As W.C. Fields once said: “Never work with children or animals.” Sometimes they are too lively or energetic for a director to cope with; they may have short attention spans; they are unpredictable. "The audience always looks for the adorable young child or animal - they steal every scene. "many stars will never appear with animals or children in the belief that no adult can compete" has been cited in print since 1931, in a newspaer article indicating that this film tradition carried over from the stage."        - Barry Popik (2012), "Never work with children or animals" (Show Business Adage) But something special happens when you place a child in front of the camera, when you let them take centre stage and unleash their imagination. In taking away the pressure and the script, a filmmaker can use that unpredictability to cre...